Information Governance for Collaborative Delivery
Version 1.0 · August 2026
Practice area 01
Standards describe what good information looks like. Governance determines whether anyone is obligated to produce it. Most projects have the first and not the second.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology estimated the annual cost of inadequate interoperability in the U.S. capital facilities industry at approximately $15.8 billion, with roughly two-thirds of that burden falling on owners and operators after handover rather than during construction. The cost of information failure is paid mostly by whoever inherits the building.
This failure persists on projects that did everything the technology literature recommends. Peer-reviewed research has documented a $113 million research facility that had a formal BIM Execution Plan, applied COBie formatting, and operated under an IPD philosophy — and whose automated exchange into the maintenance management system still failed at handover. The cause was not a missing standard. It was that no one held defined authority over what had to exist, in what state, verified by whom, before information could move.
Academic. BC 6050 — Building Information Modeling for Multi-disciplinary Integration, Georgia Institute of Technology.
The three enforcement mechanisms described here — role-based permission, record-level visibility, and immutability of closed states — are in production in a multi-entity commercial real estate operation the author administers: eighty leased units across twelve buildings, held by several distinct owners including units in undivided co-ownership.
Version 1.0 · August 2026